Biomet Hip Lawsuits Move Forward, As Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports on Latest Case Management Conference in Federal Biomet Hip Replacement Litigation


New York, New York (PRWEB) July 01, 2013

Hundreds of Biomet hip lawsuits involving the Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Replacement Program continue to move forward in the federal multidistrict litigation now underway in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana. According to a Memorandum issued by the Court on June 24th, the Biomet hip replacement litigations most recent case management conference was held on June 17, 2013, at which time a quantity of issues had been addressed, including pending motions to strike affirmative defenses, jurisdictional issues connected to the current dismissal of improperly named defendants, and the use of a kind complaint. At the conclusion of the conference, the parties presented a tutorial on the scientific and technical issues involved in the Biomet hip replacement lawsuits. (In re: Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Implant Items Liability Litigation MDL No. 2391)

&#13

This most current conference addressed a number of crucial concerns. We are pleased to see the Biomet hip replacement litigation moving ahead, and look forward to extra progress in the future, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing the victims of defective drugs and healthcare devices. The Firm is representing customers in Biomet hip lawsuits in the federal multidistrict litigation, and continues to supply free of charge and confidential case evaluations to people who may possibly have been injured by Biomet M2a Magnum implants.

&#13

Biomet Hip Replacement Lawsuits&#13

Court documents indicate that far more than 300 Biomet hip lawsuits are now pending in the federal multidistrict litigation. All of the claims allege the Biomet M2a Magnum implants metal-on-metal design can shed dangerous amounts of toxic metal debris as a outcome of wear, top to metallosis and other adverse tissue reactions, as effectively as premature device failure. According to the June 17th Memorandum, the Biomet hip replacement litigations next case management conference has been scheduled for September 23, 2013, whilst a telephonic status conference is set for July 29, 2013.

&#13

The U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) has been reviewing the security of metal-on-metal hip implants like the Biomet M2a Magnum considering that February 2011. In January, the FDA warned that the metal debris shed from these devices can trigger damage to bone and/or tissue surrounding the implant and joint, top to discomfort, implant loosening, device failure, and the want for revision surgery to replace the device. At that time, the agency advised recipients of metal-on-metal hip replacements to undergo metal ion testing if they are experiencing symptoms of hip implant failure. The FDA also stated it had proposed a new rule that would make all-metal hips ineligible for 510(k) approvals, a process which allowed such devices to come to market place with out first undergoing human clinical trials.*

&#13

Alleged victims of metal-on-metal hip implant complications associated to the Biomet M2a Magnum hip could be entitled to compensation for their medical expenditures, lost wages and discomfort and suffering. To understand far more about the Biomet hip replacement litigation, please check out Bernstein Liebhard LLPs website. For further data about filing a Biomet hip lawsuit, please contact 1 our attorneys today at 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241604.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complicated individual and class action lawsuits nationwide given that 1993, such as these who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective health-related devices and customer merchandise. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the leading plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

ten East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Attorney Advertising.

Mirena Lawsuits Move Ahead, as Case Management Conference is Convened in New Jersey Litigation, Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports


New York, New York (PRWEB) July 04, 2013

Mirena lawsuit claims filed on behalf of ladies who have allegedly suffered significant complications, such as spontaneous device migration and uterine perforations, due to their use of the IUD, are moving forward in each state and federal courts, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. Court documents indicate that a Case Management Conference was held on July 1st in the consolidated litigation established for Mirena IUD lawsuits in New Jerseys Bergen County Superior Court. According to an Order issued by the Court on July 2nd, attorneys for the parties have been directed to meet and confer within 30 days to reach agreement on a quantity of issues, including the status, scope, parameters and timing of discovery. The Court also scheduled the litigations next Case Management Conference for August 13, 2013. (In Re: Mirena Litigation Case No. 297)

&#13

Our Firm is actively representing women in Mirena lawsuits, and we continue to hear from alleged victims of critical Mirena complications, including spontaneous device migration and uterine perforations. We are pleased to see this litigation moving forward, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and medical devices. The Firm continues to provide free of charge legal evaluations to alleged victims of Mirena side effects.

&#13

Mirena IUD Lawsuits&#13

The Mirena IUD was approved by the U.S. Food &amp Drug Administration (FDA) as a birth control strategy in 2000, and later as a remedy for heavy menstrual bleeding in females who wish to use an IUD as their main form of birth handle. According to court documents, Mirena lawsuits allege that Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals downplayed its severe risks and failed to supply sufficient warnings concerning the prospective for spontaneous migration of the Mirena IUD. In addition to the consolidated litigation now underway in New Jersey Superior Court, a multidistrict litigation was not too long ago established in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York for all federally-filed Mirena IUD lawsuits. A Status Conference in the federal multidistrict litigation was held on July 2nd. (In re: Mirena IUD Items Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434)

&#13

According to a June 17th report from NewsChannel5 in Cleveland, the FDA has received more than 70,000 adverse occasion reports involving Mirena given that the device was launched in 2000. Information from the FDA also indicated that given that 2008, the agency had received a lot more than 4,700 complaints of device dislocation involving Mirena, and 1,300 reports of uterine perforations. Despite these mounting adverse event reports, there has been no indication that Bayer may be arranging to announce a Mirena IUD recall any time in the future.*

&#13

Whilst a Mirena recall does not appear imminent, the FDA has taken problem in the past with some of the claims Bayer has utilised in marketing campaigns for the IUD. In 2009, the agency issued a warning letter to Bayer after obtaining that its Mirena promotions overstated the efficacy of the device and minimized its dangers. Amongst other items, the letter cited Bayer for producing statements that indicated that Mirena would assist a lady look and really feel wonderful, and enhance her sex life.**

&#13

Ladies who have allegedly suffered significant Mirena complications following spontaneous migration of the IUD may be entitled to compensation for their health-related bills, lost wages, discomfort and suffering and other damages. To find out a lot more about Mirena lawsuits, please go to Bernstein Liebhard LLPs site. To arrange for a cost-free evaluation of your potential Mirena IUD lawsuit, please contact 800-511-5092.

&#13

*newsnet5.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/thousands-of-females-complain-about-harmful-complications-from-mirena-iud-birth-handle&#13

*http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/EnforcementActivitiesbyFDA/WarningLettersandNoticeofViolationLetterstoPharmaceuticalCompanies/UCM197229.pdf

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex person and class action lawsuits nationwide because 1993, such as these who have been harmed by harmful drugs, defective medical devices and customer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the top plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous 10 consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Attorney Marketing.

iGear’s Announces Second Generation Rugged iPad Case Produced for Schools


Chicago, IL (PRWEB) June 25, 2013

The Slim Hard Case provides multi-layer protection making use of a mixture of (1) an outer soft rubber shell, (2) an inner polycarbonate challenging case, and (3) a slim profile thats developed to fit the Bretford charging carts. This case is supremely shock absorbent and because all buttons and ports are tightly sealed, the Slim Hard Case gives rain and splash protection, whilst giving the user complete access at the same time. A constructed-in stand offers a hassle-free way to stand the iPad in each orientations, for screen sharing or movie watching. Its designed to match in virtually all well-known charging carts, which includes Bretford, Anthro, Datamation, and other individuals.

&#13

In response to feedback received from schools, the companys second generation solution, known as the STC G2, adds improvements such as a constructed-in screen protector, a stronger polycarbonate case and kickstand, with thicker padding on the soft silicone skin, making it one of the favorites for massive scale deployments.

&#13

A rugged case is a should for schools. According to an report published on Billings Gazette “About five percent of the iPads purchased for college students and staffers in Powell Wyoming have had to be repaired or replaced because they were introduced final year. Eighty-a single iPads worth $ 40,192 had been broken. Of these, seven belonged to teachers and administrators and 74 have been assigned to students. The most widespread dilemma was broken screens.

&#13

There had been other reports that iPads deployed in schools endure harm rates of up to 10%-15%, with accidental dropping becoming the most widespread. Schools that purchased rugged iPad circumstances face yet another issue the circumstances are so thick that they dont fit in charging carts, such as the Bretford PowerSync line. iGearUnlimited made a new item to address both difficulties The iPad Slim Difficult Case features a multi-layer building thats supremely shock absorbent, a polycarbonate challenging shell inner jacket that provides effect protection, and a slim profile to fit in the most common charging carts.

&#13

In a survey conducted by iGearUnlimited of K-12 schools across the country, the organization asked participants to name the most necessary functions of an iPad case for schools. The answers didn’t surprise anybody:&#13

1. A rugged case that can protect the iPad from every day use and abuse&#13

two. Not too bulky require to fit in the well-known Bretford charging cart and kids’ backpack&#13

3. Built-in screen protector simple to use, usually on, no hassle protection of the iPads screen&#13

3. Constructed-in kick-stand that performs in both vertical and horizontal orientations&#13

4. Trackable schools asset ID need show as a trackable barcodes on each and every case&#13

5. Customizable schools love to show their logo on each iPad case&#13

six. Low cost get the maximum quantity of protection and functions for the least amount of money

&#13

An overwhelming majority voted iGear’s Slim Difficult Case as their iPad case of option simply because it’s the only iPad case on the industry created to satisfy the wants of schools.

&#13

In a recent YouTube video, the companys Slim Hard Case was place via a 20ft drop test from a second floor window to a driveway. The iPhone escaped without having a scratch, while recording video the entire time. See drop test video here. The exact same case style and level of protection is carried more than to the iPad line as effectively.

&#13

Another special feature of the Slim Challenging Case the customization selection. Utilizing a Hard Skin decal, schools can print full-colour logo artwork, asset tracking ID and barcode, and other data for each and every iPad, generating managing several devices super straightforward.

&#13

The iPad Slim Challenging Case G2 is designed with schools wants in thoughts. says Jimmy Sun, president of iGearUnlimited.com. It delivers all the characteristics technology directors ask for, and fits in the Bretford and other charging carts.

&#13

The Slim Challenging Case is offered from iGearUnlimited.com. Schools ought to make contact with the business straight for educational discounts. iGear also tends to make a custom photo case for the iPad, well-known with schools sports teams and other activity groups.

&#13

About iGearUnlimited.com&#13

iGearUnlimited.com is powered by Sunrise Digital, an Inc. 5000 firm established in 1988 and employs the most sophisticated equipment and technologies, such as G7-certified HP Indigo and UV flatbed presses, and digital die-cutting, to generate ideal-in-class goods. A privately-owned enterprise, the business is primarily based in Chicago and sells merchandise worldwide.

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Discover Far more Administrator Press Releases

United Law Group to Appeal Ruling in Case Against Bank of America and Subsidiary Countrywide House Loans


Irvine, CA (Vocus) February eight, 2010

United Law Group will appeal the dismissal of their suit against Bank of America and its subsidiary Countrywide Property Loans in the 19th Circuit Court of Appeals. Previously denied their motion to dismiss the lawsuit in the Santa Ana Federal Court, Bank of America attorney argued that the bank had the proper to slander United Law Group simply because of Californias anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) law. U.S. District Judge Andrew J. Guilford agreed to dismiss the case primarily based on the laws broad-sweeping language, which delivers protection to massive corporations.

&#13

The anti-SLAPP statute cited by the judge in this case has been amended 5 occasions and has more than 330 distinct legal opinions. The ruling fundamentally says that its okay for corporations to slander in the name of enterprise, mentioned United Law Group Managing Director Robert Buscho. If a man on the street stated the items that the Bank of America representatives said they would be liable. Anti-SLAPP law provides protections to massive corporations that the average individual does not have. The language employed to frighten and confuse home owners hurt those property owners and United Law Groups reputation. It appears that the banks do not want buyers to have legal representation throughout this method and will do what ever they can to ensure that happens.

&#13

The ruling came just one particular week just before New York’s lawyer general charged Bank of America Corp., its former Chief Executive Kenneth Lewis and former Chief Economic Officer Joe Value with fraud for allegedly misleading shareholders about the bank’s acquisition of Merrill Lynch &amp Co.

&#13

When men and women call their bank, they trust that they are becoming told the truth, said Buscho. Distressed home owners are in a tenuous position. Granting banks the appropriate to say whatever they want without having recourse opens up a Pandoras box, specifically when it is clear from the recent fraud charges that there are challenges with ethics and honesty internally.

&#13

The original case was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California County of Orange Central Justice Center against Bank of America and its subsidiary Countrywide Property Loans, Inc. for tortuous interference with contract, defamation (slander) and unfair organization practices (pursuant to B&ampP Code

United Law Group Senior Managing Lawyer Refutes Allegations of Misconduct in Jacobs Case

Irvine, CA (Vocus) February 24, 2010

United Law Group’s senior managing attorney Robert Buscho right now released a statement and documentation that counters the allegations produced about the firm. The documents contain the request for information submitted to United Law Group by means of the internet on January 18, 2009, a recording of the message left by a United Law Group representative following up on his request, a recording of the get in touch with exactly where Jacobs retained the firm and was advised that the firm would not inform him to cease producing his month-to-month mortgage payments, and a copy of the trial modification agreement dated March 2, 2009 in which the bank offered to lessen his payments by $ 664 by cutting his rate from 8.2% to five.75% and minimizing his principal by more than $ 50,000.

&#13

Warren Jacobs reached out to United Law Group and requested a call from the firm by means of an on the internet form that he submitted requesting extra information about a forensic loan audit on January 18, 2009, stated Buscho. He was not contacted by a so-named robo-dialer.

&#13

ULG staff documented speaking to Mr. Jacobs eight occasions in between February 1 and March 9, 2009. File notes also indicate correspondence with the lender throughout that time. On March 2, 2009, a mere six weeks right after becoming retained by Mr. Jacobs, ULGs efforts on his behalf resulted in a loan modification provide that lowered his interest price from 8.2% to five.75%, slashed his monthly principal and interest payment from $ 1,511.22 to $ 847.82 and reduce the quantity owed on the note from $ 207,855.35 to $ 156,250.00 a principal reduction of over $ 50,000.

&#13

ULG employees communicated with Mr. Jacobs about the modification on March 9, 2009 and told him to begin producing payments on the new system. He chose not to take the provide and asked if the firm could do greater. He then lost his job a month later and informed the firm that he wanted to delay issues simply because he lost his job.

&#13

United Law Group personnel either spoke to or left messages for Mr. Jacobs numerous occasions between April and May 2009 to talk about his economic predicament and the danger of foreclosure. He failed to return calls to the firm.

&#13

“While Mr. Jacob’s plight may possibly sound like that of many American’s, the reality is that he was not making proper use of a technique that was developed to aid ‘honest’ property owners,” said Buscho.

&#13

The article contends that Jacobs hired an additional lawyer to file bankruptcy on his behalf in June 2009 soon after United Law Group failed to take certain actions to delay foreclosure.

&#13

“United Law Group did not supply to file bankruptcy on Mr. Jacobs’ behalf due to the fact he previously filed a Petition beneath Chapter 7 on April 15, 2003. With no complaint objecting to the discharge getting been timely filed, he received a discharge from the U. S. Bankruptcy, Northern District of Texas, on July 31, 2003,” said Buscho. “In the article, writer Paul Elias states that Mr. Jacobs claims to have filed one more bankruptcy petition in June of 2009. If this was completed, it would be an illegal filing as Mr. Jacobs is not entitled to far more than a single discharge below Chapter 7 inside seven years. He would therefore be an ineligible debtor below Bankruptcy Code

Mirena IUD Lawsuits Move Forward, as Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes Upcoming Case Management Conference in Federal Mirena Side Effects Litigation


New York, New York (PRWEB) June 23, 2013

Mirena IUD lawsuit claims continue to move forward in the federal multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. According to court documents, the subsequent Status Conference in the federal Mirena side effects litigation is scheduled for July 1, 2013. So far, practically 50 claims have been filed in the Southern District of New York on behalf of women who suffered spontaneous device migration, uterine perforations, and other injuries, allegedly due to the Mirena IUD. (In re: Mirena IUD Items Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434)

&#13

We continue to hear from women who allegedly suffered significant Mirena side effects. We appear forward to additional progress in this litigation in the coming months, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and healthcare devices. The Firm continues to provide free Mirena lawsuit consultations to ladies who have been allegedly harmed as a outcome of spontaneous migration of the Mirena IUD.

&#13

Mirena Lawsuits&#13

The Mirena IUD was authorized by the U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) as a birth control strategy in 2000. In 2009, Mirenas authorized makes use of have been expanded to consist of therapy of heavy menstrual bleeding in females who wish to use an IUD as their approach of birth control. NewsChannel5 in Cleveland, Ohio reported on June 17th that a lot more 70,000 adverse event reports involving the Mirena IUD have been logged with the FDA because 2000, such as thousands involving device dislocation and uterine perforations.*

&#13

Court filings indicate that plaintiffs in Mirena lawsuits are alleged to have suffered severe injuries due to spontaneous migration of the IUD. Claims further allege that Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals downplayed potential Mirena side effects and failed to offer adequate warnings with regards to the prospective for spontaneous device migration. In addition to the federal litigation now underway in the Southern District of New York, at least 100 Mirena IUD lawsuits have been filed in a consolidated litigation underway in New Jerseys Bergen County Superior Court. (In Re: Mirena Litigation Case No. 297)

&#13

Alleged victims of Mirena side effects might be eligible to file claims in either of these litigations if they suffered from injuries related to spontaneous migration of the IUD. Understand a lot more about Mirena lawsuits by going to Bernstein Liebhard LLPs website. For added information, please call 800-511-5092.&#13

&#13
newsnet5.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/thousands-of-women-complain-about-unsafe-complications-from-mirena-iud-birth-manage

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complicated person and class action lawsuits nationwide given that 1993, like those who have been harmed by unsafe drugs, defective medical devices and customer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the prime plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.

Kramer and Kaslow: Georgia Army Sergeant Wins Case against PHH Mortgage Corp.


Calabasas, California (PRWEB) May 03, 2011

A jury in Georgia not too long ago awarded a Fort Benning Army sergeant, David Brash, more than twenty million dollars since of what attorney Philip A. Kramer calls the egregious style of his lender (David Brash v. PHH Mortgage Corp., undertaking company as Coldwell Banker case Quantity: four:2009cv00146 Georgia Middle District Court).

&#13

For the duration of his testimony, Brash stated that considering that he was going into combat, he set up an automatic mortgage payment, but following eighteen months, Coldwell Banker began sending late payment notices and generating telephone calls demanding payment. Concerned that a negative report to the credit reporting agencies may possibly negatively influence his military career and make it hard to get a safety clearance, Brash instantly contacted the bank to inform the lender of their error and to make confident that Coldwell Banker did not erroneously report a late payment to the credit bureaus.

&#13

According to court documents, Brash made many attempts to right the banks erroneous reporting of delinquencies even though the bank was in reality getting mortgage payments by means of automatic deduction from Sergeant Brashs account. Also according to court documents, Sergeant Brashs letters to the mortgage company went unanswered violating federal laws. His phone calls were routed to overseas consumer service workers who had been unable to answer his inquiries.

&#13

For the duration of the trial, the bank was forced to admit that their overseas employees had limited access to information. The bank was additional embarrassed when numerous of the calls all recorded by PHH as a matter of standard operating procedure, had been played in court. According to the recordings played in court, Brash was placed on hold for 30, 40 , and at least when for 55 minutes, and then, if he wasnt disconnected, would be presented with a distinct response and a promise to get back to him which in no way occurred.

&#13

Philip Kramer, a perennial recipient of the prestigious Southern California Super Lawyer award, says he was appalled by Sergeant Brashs remedy, but not shocked. I deal with home owners complaints each and every day and am currently leading numerous of the biggest mass joinder lawsuits ever brought against the banks for their poor behavior in the mortgage crisis, says Kramer. Each day, I deal with individuals whose homes are in foreclosure, and it in no way ceases to amaze me how callous, and typically incompetent, the banks behavior is in dealing with people. Im not surprised that a jury awarded Mr. Bash so significantly for his problems.

&#13

According to Brashs testimony, he recognized that he was not generating progress with the bank by way of his personal private efforts, so he engaged an attorney to represent him. Initially, Brash mentioned all he sought was to avoid a damaging report to the credit bureaus. Regardless of several phone calls and written requests, in November 2009, Brash was reported as becoming significant delinquent to credit reporting agencies.

&#13

When the matter went to trial, the jury was appalled at how David Brash had been treated, says Philip Kramer. According to court documents, the jury awarded Brash 1 million dollars in compensatory damages plus $ 575 for out of pocket costs. They also awarded him $ 350,000 for attorney costs. The 20 million dollar award was for punitive damages.

&#13

No a single goes into a trial for exciting, says Kramer. The bank had each chance right here to appropriate their errors, and instead by way of incompetence and denial, the produced matters worse and worse. Its a sad comment when even the military gets no respect, when they behave like this toward a patriot, a man who puts himself in harms way to safeguard our nation. I want that none of my clientele required my aid. But unless the banks begin to get it and adjust their behavior, Im sad to say I feel there are going to be a lot much more folks looking for legal redress.

&#13

http://www.gadailynews.com/news/columbus/64192-sergeant-awarded-20-million.html#ixzz1LE000gze

&#13

ABOUT PHILIP KRAMER&#13

PHILIP A. KRAMER is the senior companion of the Law Workplace of Kramer &amp Kaslow, in Calabasas, California. Kramer &amp Kaslow is Martindale Hubbell AV rated. Mr. Kramer is a perennial recipient of the prestigious Southern California Super Lawyer award.

&#13

Mr. Kramer received his undergraduate degree from Ohio State University and his Juris Doctorate from the Catholic University of America, in Washington, DC. His practice emphasizes commercial litigation and trial advocacy, with a concentration on enterprise litigation, and true property matters. He has prosecuted and defended instances for over twenty five years.

&#13

Mr. Kramer is a licensed genuine estate broker and has spent considerable time supplying legal solutions in connection with real estate problems relating to loan modification and loss mitigation, land use and zoning, environmental troubles, easements, building and development, finance, and landlord tenant matters.

&#13

Mr. Kramer is admitted to practice ahead of all courts in the State of California, the United States Supreme Court and the United States Court of Military Appeals. Mr. Kramer has attempted in excess of 200 situations. He has appeared on nationally televised programs with regards to pre-trial process and trial technique and has appeared as a guest lecturer on subjects ranging from constitutional law to trial practice, and Mr. Kramer frequently lectures on a broad spectrum of a variety of legal and business issues.

&#13

Mr. Kramer also serves as a Judge Pro Tem for the Los Angeles Superior Court and as a Mediator.

&#13

Mr. Kramer is also a past president of the Los Angeles West Inns of Court, a national organization committed to bringing professionalism and civility back into the legal profession. He also serves on many Boards of Directors and serves as an officer in a lot of businesses. For much more information call (818) 224-3900 or go to http://kramer-kaslow.com

&#13

###

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Maryland Attorney Mike Slocumb Comments on Google Privacy Class Action Lawsuit and NSA Surveillance Case

Baltimore, MD (PRWEB) June 13, 2013

Baltimore, Maryland private injury lawyer Mike Slocumb these days said his law firm is handling a class action lawsuit that has privacy troubles similar to the ones being raised in the story involving the National Security Administration and its collection of online content.

&#13

Slocumb mentioned his client, Matthew C. Knowles of Maryland, was interviewed by CBS News on June 11, 2013. Knowles is named as a plaintiff in a Google privacy class action lawsuit (Knowles v. Google, Inc., case number five:2013cv01601) filed April 9, 2013, in California Northern District Court. The lawsuit was originally filed in the District of Maryland.

&#13

In the complaint, Knowles alleges that Googles practice of intercepting emails sent to Maryland residents with Google Gmail accounts amounts to an invasion of privacy and is in violation of the Maryland Wiretap Act.

&#13

Knowles alleges in the complaint that the search engine giant routinely intercepts messages sent by non-Gmail subscribers to Gmail accounts without their understanding or consent. The lawsuit alleges that Google makes use of the details it gathers to create a targeted advertisement directed at the non-Gmail subscriber.

&#13

There are parallels between our consumers case and the case involving the government surveillance of private citizens, stated Slocumb, a personal injury lawyer with an workplace in Baltimore. Search engine firms are monitoring private emails, and the National Safety Agency is collecting domestic telephone information. The governments actions came to light following a former employee of a government contractor blew the whistle. In the case had been handling, our client is assisting to shine a light on what these search engine organizations are doing. Its offensive and in some instances illegal when somebody intercepts communications that parties have a correct to think is sensitive, privileged and confidential.

&#13

Edward Snowden, a former employee of a government contractor who admitted leaking secret government documents about the controversial surveillance applications, might soon be facing charges, according CBSNews.com report published on June 11, 2013, and titled Feds prepping charges against Edward Snowden: Sources.

&#13

Slocumb said some other states have privacy laws similar to Marylands. He stated other lawsuits have been filed against Google and Yahoo in California, alleging that the firms violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act. The 12 states with laws stating that each parties need to consent to being wiretapped or recorded include California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington and Illinois.

&#13

Slocumb said folks who reside in any of the above-mentioned states may be entitled to be a portion of a class action lawsuit. As personal injury lawyers, we think in protecting the rights of individuals who have suffered losses, regardless of whether its in an accident or its by way of the reckless action of a big corporation. In the case involving Google, we think the search engine firm is intercepting emails and making use of the content material without having the senders permission. We think our class action lawsuit is not just about any a single particular person. Its about safeguarding the rights of every person. Its about sending a message that this kind of behavior will not be tolerated.

&#13

About the Mike Slocumb Law Firm

&#13

The Mike Slocumb Law Firm aids men and women who have been harmed by way of the negligent actions of other folks or organizations pursue compensation. The firm, which can be founded on the web at http://www.slocumblaw.com, handles class action lawsuits as properly as auto accident claims, health-related malpractice, slip and fall accidents, nursing house negligence and much more. With offices throughout the country, the law firm functions for clientele on a contingency fee basis. That indicates you pay nothing at all if you dont win. For a lot more details about what joining the Google privacy class action lawsuit, get in touch with 1-800-HURTLINE or comprehensive the on-line contact form.

&#13

The Baltimore workplace for the Mike Slocumb Law Firm is positioned at 111 S. Calvert Street, Suite 2700, Baltimore, Maryland, 21202.

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Locate More Administrator Press Releases

iGear’s New iPad Slim Difficult Case is Created For Schools


Chicago, IL (PRWEB) June 06, 2013

A rugged case is a must for schools. According to an article published on Billings Gazette “About 5 percent of the iPads purchased for school students and staffers in Powell Wyoming have had to be repaired or replaced since they were introduced last year. Eighty-one iPads worth $ 40,192 were damaged. Of those, seven belonged to teachers and administrators and 74 were assigned to students. The most common problem was broken screens.

There had been other reports that iPads deployed in schools suffer damage rates of up to 10%-15%, with accidental dropping being the most common. Schools that purchased rugged iPad cases face another problem the cases are so thick that they dont fit in charging carts, such as the Bretford PowerSync line. iGearUnlimited designed a new product to address both problems The iPad Slim Tough Case features a multi-layer construction thats supremely shock absorbent, a polycarbonate hard shell inner jacket that offers impact protection, and a slim profile to fit in the most popular charging carts.

In a survey conducted by iGearUnlimited of K-12 schools across the country, the company asked participants to name the most needed features of an iPad case for schools. The answers didn’t surprise anyone:

1. A rugged case that can protect the iPad from daily use and abuse

2. Not too bulky need to fit in the popular Bretford charging cart and kids’ backpack

3. Built-in screen protector easy to use, always on, no hassle protection of the iPads screen

3. Built-in kick-stand that works in both vertical and horizontal orientations

4. Trackable schools asset ID need show as a trackable barcodes on each case

5. Customizable schools love to show their logo on each iPad case

6. Low cost get the maximum amount of protection and features for the least amount of money

An overwhelming majority voted iGear’s Slim Tough Case as their iPad case of choice because it’s the only iPad case on the market designed to satisfy the needs of schools.

The Slim Tough Case offers multi-layer protection using a combination of (1) an outer soft rubber shell, (2) an inner polycarbonate hard case, and (3) a slim profile thats designed to fit the Bretford charging carts. This case is supremely shock absorbent and since all buttons and ports are tightly sealed, the Slim Tough Case provides rain and splash protection, while giving the user full access at the same time. A built-in stand offers a convenient way to stand the iPad in both orientations, for screen sharing or moving watching. Its designed to fit in virtually all popular charging carts, including Bretford, Anthro, Datamation, and others.

In a recent YouTube video, the companys Slim Tough Case was put through a 20ft drop test from a second floor window to a driveway. The iPhone escaped without a scratch, while recording video the whole time. See drop test video here. The same case design and level of protection is carried over to the iPad line as well.

Another unique feature of the Slim Tough Case the customization option. Using a Tough Skin decal, schools can print full-color logo artwork, asset tracking ID and barcode, and other information for each iPad, making managing multiple devices super easy.

iGears Slim Tough Case is by far the perfect case for schools, says Jimmy Sun, president of iGearUnlimited.com. It offers excellent protection for the iPad while works with all popular charging carts.

The Slim Tough Case is available from iGearUnlimited.com. Schools should contact the company directly for educational discounts. iGear also makes a custom photo case for the iPad, popular with schools sports teams and other activity groups.

About iGearUnlimited.com

iGearUnlimited.com is powered by Sunrise Digital, an Inc. 5000 company established in 1988 and employs the most advanced equipment and technology, such as G7-certified HP Indigo and UV flatbed presses, and digital die-cutting, to create best-in-class products. A privately-owned enterprise, the company is based in Chicago and sells products worldwide.







California Case Alleging Negligent Servicing by Ocwen Survives Initial Stages of Litigation.


Roseville, CA (PRWEB) July 10, 2012

UFAN Legal Group, Pc (UFAN) won an crucial victory recently in its suit against Ocwen Loan Serivicing, LLP (Ocwen). The lawsuit survived demurrer filed by Ocwen and the case is now expected to either settle or move forward to trial.

&#13

UFAN filed its complaint against Ocwen on February 9, 2012 in Alameda County Superior Court (case quantity RG12616583) on behalf of borrowers whose loans are serviced by Ocwen. The case targets Ocwens alleged damaging servicing practices, which includes the banks improper handling of mortgage modifications. The case was amended on May 2, 2012.

&#13

On June 28, 2012, the Honorable Robert B. Freedman in the case ruled that Plaintiffs servicing claim was sufficiently plead and that the claim will proceed to trial unless the parties very first settle. Ocwen was given 30 days from the judgment to answer the complaint.

&#13

Primarily based on the indications of each parties that settlement negotiations were ongoing, the judge has allowed 120 days just before the subsequent case management conference to allow the parties to attempt to settle the claims out-of-court.

&#13

UFAN continues to fight for the rights of distressed property owners who have been allegedly injured by poor company practices of banks, and who have been left without having help from other government sponsored programs.

&#13

If you believe you could have been injured by your lender or loan servicer, UFAN offers complementary attorney consultations to assist distressed property owners in assessing attainable alternatives for relief like, but not restricted to, litigation and bankruptcy.

&#13

Click here to get in touch with UFAN.

&#13

ABOUT THE UNITED FORECLOSURE Lawyer NETWORK

&#13

UFAN Legal Group, Computer dba United Foreclosure Attorney Network (UFAN) is a Roseville, California-based law firm delivering mortgage litigation and other debt related legal services. The devoted attorneys and staff at UFAN function tirelessly to seek justice and fight for the rights of its clients. For far more data call toll totally free 1-866-400-4242.

&#13

This release may constitute lawyer advertisement. Kristin Crone, Esq. is the lawyer responsible for this advertisement. The info in this release and on the UFAN website (ufanlaw.com) is for general info purposes only. Nothing at all in this release or on the UFAN web site need to be taken as legal advice. Prior successes are no guarantee of future efficiency. Litigation is inherently uncertain and results in litigation are never ever assured.

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Related Loan Modification Services Press Releases