Wells Fargo Borrowers in California Nonetheless in Require of Mortgage Relief Regardless of Current Lawyer Basic Settlement


Roseville, California (PRWEB) June 14, 2012

Though settlement was reached recently with the States Attorneys Common, UFAN Legal Group, Pc (UFAN) continues to see important interest in litigation against Wells Fargo and the other key banks participating in the settlement. Despite the settlement, numerous California property owners continue with no relief.

&#13

UFAN filed its initial complaint against Wells Fargo on September 1, 2011 in Sacramento Superior Court (case quantity 34-2011-00110146). The case targets alleged fraud in the origination of loans, Wells Fargos improper servicing of borrowers loans, and other claims mostly concerned with contract law.

&#13

The Judicial Counsel of California lately agreed to coordinate this case with yet another related case pending in Los Angeles (Mireles v. Wells Fargo, Case No. BC467652, filed August 16, 2011). All similarly situated Plaintiffs now bring claims collectively. Likely, there will be an chance to add more Plaintiffs with similar claims.

&#13

Recent news headlines feature a significant settlement in between the States Attorneys General and 4 major banks, such as Wells Fargo. While Wells Fargo, via this settlement, agreed to a big money payout both to participating states and particular groups of distressed borrowers, numerous borrowers continue to be left without having relief. For example, the settlement does not cover homeowners whose mortgages are owned by government sponsored entities like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to media reports. Reportedly, these loans make up more than 60% of California homeowners, and the settlement itself will only apply to about 250,000 California home owners.

&#13

Although the settlement precludes certain new actions by state officials against participating banks, it does not limit private lawsuits filed on behalf of home owners. UFAN continues to fight for the rights of distressed homeowners who have been injured by the poor enterprise practices of Wells Fargo, and who have been left with no assistance despite governmental efforts.

&#13

If you think you may have been injured by your lender, UFAN delivers complementary lawyer consultations to assist distressed property owners in assessing possible alternatives for relief like, but not restricted to, litigation and bankruptcy. Click right here to make contact with UFAN.

&#13

ABOUT THE UNITED FORECLOSURE Attorney NETWORK

&#13

UFAN Legal Group, Pc dba United Foreclosure Attorney Network (UFAN) is a Roseville, California-primarily based law firm providing mortgage litigation and other debt related legal services. The committed attorneys and staff at UFAN operate tirelessly to seek justice and fight for the rights of its consumers. For more information call toll free 1-866-400-4242.

&#13

This release may possibly constitute lawyer advertisement. Kristin Crone, Esq. is the attorney accountable for this advertisement. The information in this release and on the UFAN internet site (ufanlaw.com) is for basic details purposes only. Practically nothing in this release or on the UFAN web site ought to be taken as legal suggestions. Prior successes are no guarantee of future overall performance. Litigation is inherently uncertain and benefits in litigation are by no means assured.

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

JP Morgan Chase Borrowers in California Nonetheless in Want of Mortgage Relief Regardless of Current Lawyer General Settlement


Roseville, CA (PRWEB) June 18, 2012

Although settlement was reached recently with the States Attorneys Basic, UFAN Legal Group, Computer (UFAN) continues to see significant interest in litigation against Chase and the other key banks participating in the settlement. In spite of the settlement, numerous California property owners continue with no relief.

&#13

UFAN filed its 1st complaint against JP Morgan Chase on October 18, 2011 in Superior Court for Contra Costa County (case number C-11-02390). The case targets problems origination of loans, Chases alleged improper servicing of borrowers loans, and other claims mainly concerned with contract law. The case has been amended twice in the initial half of 2012. UFAN is at the moment looking for new consumers, similarly situated with current plaintiffs, who are left without relief.

&#13

Current news headlines discuss the settlement in between the States Attorneys General and five main banks, which includes JP Morgan Chase. Even though Chase, by means of this settlement, agreed to a large money payout each to participating states and specific groups of distressed borrowers, a lot of borrowers continue to be left with no relief. For instance, the settlement does not cover property owners whose mortgages are owned by government sponsored entities like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to a February 2012 LA Occasions report. Reportedly, these loans make up far more than 60% of California home owners, and the settlement itself will only apply to about 250,000 California homeowners.

&#13

Even though the settlement precludes certain new actions by state officials against participating banks, it does not limit private lawsuits filed on behalf of home owners. UFAN continues to fight for the rights of distressed homeowners who have been injured by the poor enterprise practices of JP Morgan Chase, and who have been left without having assistance despite governmental efforts.

&#13

If you think you may have been injured by your lender, UFAN delivers complementary lawyer consultations to assist distressed homeowners in assessing feasible choices for relief which includes, but not limited to, litigation and bankruptcy. Click right here to get in touch with UFAN.