Rottenstein Law Group LLP Comments on News Reports of Mirena IUD Side Effects


New York, NY (PRWEB) June 19, 2013

As Mirena IUD lawsuits proceed in courts, the Rottenstein Law Group LLP highlights a recent news story from an NBC affiliate in Cleveland that features the critical alleged side effects of the hormone-based contraceptive device. The Rottenstein Law Group LLP publicizes this details to help these searching to file Mirena lawsuits and who are interested in understanding more about Mirena side effects.

&#13

The U.S. Meals and Drug Administration has logged more than 70,000 complaints about the Mirena hormonal intrauterine device since the product very first went to marketplace in 2000, according to a June 17 NewsChannel five report.* Practically 5,000 of them have reported device migration, in which the IUD is displaced from its implantation website and moves to other parts of the uterus or beyond. The story even highlights a court case in which a woman alleges her Mirena IUD migrated into her rib cage.This can lead to the IUD becoming embedded in a womans uterine wall, the story stated. Far more than 1,300 ladies have complained about the IUD perforating their uteruses.

&#13

The ladies in the NBC report affirm the issues of those who get in touch with us searching to file Mirena lawsuits, said Rochelle Rottenstein, principal of the Rottenstein Law Group LLP. As far more media interest is paid to the suffering, the far more these ladies feel empowered to investigate their alternatives for compensation.

&#13

Much more than 60 Mirena lawsuits have been consolidated recently in New Jersey state court due to the fact they have widespread causes for suit, which makes it possible for for far more efficient pretrial proceedings, according to court documents in In re Mirena Litigation (Case No. 297, Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County). The plaintiffs allege the very same side effects as described in the NBC report.

&#13

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP encourages those with the Mirena hormonal IUD to pay a visit to this web page to download a free informational brochure about the device and users eligibility to file a lawsuit.

&#13

*nbcnews.com/id/52236628/#.UcC8cYletEI

&#13

For the most recent news on defective medicines and health-related devices and related lawsuits, check out the Rottenstein Law Group LLPs Injury Lawyer Newswire at injurylawyernewswire.com. Readers can subscribe to the news web sites stories and videos to remain on leading of individual injury news.

&#13

About THE ROTTENSTEIN LAW GROUP LLP&#13

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP is a New York-based firm that represents consumers nationwide in mass tort actions. The firm was founded by Rochelle Rottenstein, who has much more than two decades of experience as a lawyer, to represent consumers hurt by defective medical devices and medicines. (Lawyer marketing. Prior benefits do not assure a similar outcome.)

&#13

Make contact with:&#13

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP&#13

Rochelle Rottenstein, Esq.&#13

321 W. 44th Street&#13

# 804&#13

New York NY 10036&#13

(212) 933-9500 (office phone)&#13

(212) 933-9980 (facsimile)&#13

rochelle (at) rotlaw (dot) com

&#13

Mirena Lawsuit News: Bernstein Liebhard LLP Comments on Mounting Reports of Mirena Side Effects, Like Device Migration, Uterine Perforations


New York, New York (PRWEB) June 18, 2013

As Mirena lawsuit claims continue to move forward in each state and federal court, a new report has revealed that that the IUD has been the subject of far more than 70,000 U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) adverse occasion reports since coming on the market in 2000. According to NewsChannel5 in Cleveland, Ohio, over 4.700 Mirena customers have reported device dislocation or migration to the FDA given that 2008, even though far more than 1,300 have reportedly seasoned uterine perforations due to Mirena.*

&#13

We are not at all shocked by these numbers, as our Firm receives inquiries on a standard basis from females who have allegedly suffered uterine perforations, device migration, and other severe Mirena side effects. The injuries described in this report echo a lot of what we have heard from our own Mirena lawsuit consumers, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and medical devices. The Firm continues to provide free Mirena IUD lawsuit consultations to females who were allegedly harmed by this contraceptive device.

&#13

Mirena Lawsuits&#13

According to the NewsChannel5 report, dozens of Mirena IUD lawsuits are at the moment pending in courts around the nation. Plaintiffs in these claims have allegedly suffered horrific injuries due to dislocation of the Mirena IUD, which includes instances where the device punctured the uterus and moved into the abdominal cavity and broken other organs. In one case, a plaintiff allegedly suffered a lacerated liver due to Mirena migration, while other people had been forced to undergo hysterectomies due to the fact of their injuries. 1 lady interviewed for the report even suffered permanent nerve damage right after undergoing surgery to take away a Mirena IUD that had migrated outside of her uterus. Regardless of these types of incidents, nevertheless, there is no indication that Bayer is organizing to concern a Mirena recall for the IUD.

&#13

Court documents indicate that some 100 MIrena lawsuits are pending in a consolidated litigation underway in New Jersey Superior Court, Bergen County. A Case Management Conference has been scheduled for July 1st in that litigation. (In Re: Mirena Litigation Case No. 297) Meanwhile, at least 50 federally-filed Mirena side impact claims are also pending in a federal multidistrict litigation now underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. Even so, attorneys interviewed for the NewsChannel5 report predicted that hundreds of added Mirena IUD lawsuits would likely be filed in the near future. (In re: Mirena IUD Merchandise Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434)

&#13

Girls who suffered device migration, uterine perforations and other serious Mirena side effects could be entitled to compensation for their health-related costs, lost wages, pain and suffering and other damages. To understand much more about filing a Mirena lawsuit, please pay a visit to Bernstein Liebhard LLPs internet site. For far more data, please call 800-511-5092.

&#13

*newsnet5.com/dpp/news/neighborhood_news/investigations/thousands-of-ladies-complain-about-harmful-complications-from-mirena-iud-birth-manage

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex person and class action lawsuits nationwide because 1993, such as those who have been harmed by unsafe drugs, defective healthcare devices and consumer merchandise. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the top plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous 10 consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

ten East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.

Law Offices of Kramer and Kaslow: Mortgage Crisis Report from NBC Nightly News


Calabasas, CA (PRWEB) June 07, 2011

NBC Nightly News is running a multi-part series detailing the foreclosure crisis in America (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42881365/ns/business-private_finance/#). The series examines how the mortgage crisis began, its impact on homeowners, and why, according to NBC, it is worsening, not acquiring much better. The series begins with a vignette about Garrett and Laura Holmes of Vermont and tells the story of how the couple practically lost their house by searching for support via the government HAMP plan.

&#13

Philip Kramer, a effectively-identified consolidated plaintive litigation attorney who is suing a quantity of lenders on behalf of aggrieved home owners observes, The Nightly News series demonstrates how deeply flawed existing technique is. Without resorting to the courts, it is really, extremely difficult for a homeowner to get a fair shake.

&#13

Further observations from Philip Kramer can be discovered at http://kramer-kaslow.com/blog/2011/06/kramer-and-kaslow-courts-the-last-resort-for-forclosing-residences/

&#13

About Philip Kramer&#13

Philip A. Kramer is the senior companion of the Law Office of Kramer &amp Kaslow, in Calabasas, California. Kramer &amp Kaslow is Martindale Hubbell AV rated. Mr. Kramer is a perennial recipient of the prestigious Southern California Super Lawyer award.

&#13

Mr. Kramer received his undergraduate degree from Ohio State University and his Juris Doctorate from the Catholic University of America, in Washington, DC. His practice emphasizes commercial litigation and trial advocacy, with a concentration on enterprise litigation, and true home matters. He has prosecuted and defended situations for over twenty 5 years.

&#13

Mr. Kramer is a licensed real estate broker and has spent considerable time offering legal services in connection with real estate concerns relating to loan modification and loss mitigation, land use and zoning, environmental concerns, easements, building and improvement, finance, and landlord tenant matters.

&#13

Mr. Kramer is admitted to practice before all courts in the State of California, the United States Supreme Court and the United States Court of Military Appeals. Mr. Kramer has tried in excess of 200 instances. He has appeared on nationally televised applications relating to pre-trial procedure and trial strategy and has appeared as a guest lecturer on topics ranging from constitutional law to trial practice, and Mr. Kramer often lectures on a broad spectrum of numerous legal and business problems.

&#13

Mr. Kramer also serves as a Judge Pro Tem for the Los Angeles Superior Court and as a Mediator.

&#13

Mr. Kramer is also a past president of the Los Angeles West Inns of Court, a national organization committed to bringing professionalism and civility back into the legal profession. He also serves on several Boards of Directors and serves as an officer in numerous businesses. For far more data call (818) 224-3900 or pay a visit to http://kramer-kaslow.com

&#13

###

&#13

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

HAMP 2015 Extension Date Great News For Millions Of U.S. Property owners – LoanLove.com

San Diego, CA (PRWEB) June 14, 2013

LoanLove.com is a trusted destination for current mortgage news and professional loan tips. The team at LoanLove.com is devoted to help empower both initial time and seasoned property owners with valuable sources, 1st-class information and connections to leading-rated market experts. Loan Really like recently posted a mortgage news write-up about the not too long ago announced HAMP 2015 extension and how it will benefit struggling property owners.

&#13

Loan Really like reports: The Obama administration has announced a HAMP extension for 2 extra years, by means of 2015. It will be extending its hallmark Producing Property Inexpensive (MHA) initiative until the finish of 2015, hoping the extension will allow more property owners to take benefit of loan modifications which can aid them avoid foreclosure.

&#13

Originally unveiled in 2009 at the height of the monetary crisis, the HAMP (House Affordable Modification Plan) which is element of the bigger Making Home Inexpensive System, was created with the aim of assisting the millions of home owners who had fallen behind on their mortgage payments due to the crisis to avoid otherwise imminent foreclosure. The plan performs by rewriting (modifying) the loan terms, therefore producing the house payments more inexpensive for the borrower. According to data from the U.S. Treasury, homeowners participating in the program have realized median monthly savings of $ 546.

&#13

Even so, this system has but to aid all these that it was designed to assist. According to predictions from the Administration below Obama loan modification with this plan must be capable to offer aid for as several as three to 4 million American home owners so far only a little over 1 million home owners have taken benefit of the loan modification program. This may possibly be due to the strict documentation requirements that originally had to be met by the applicants. Modifications to the system have now streamlined application processes, nevertheless, and applying for the plan is no longer as cumbersome and demanding as it as soon as was.

&#13

But even although the program could be the answer for several property owners who are facing foreclosure, the Loan Love write-up still cautions readers to do their research: Although certainly beneficial to homeowners facing economic troubles, home loan modification can be a complex procedure driven mainly by the lender. Property owners searching for to make sure they receive the very best modification terms can empower themselves by getting an independent evaluation performed on their loan and their financial circumstance. The REST Report presented by Actual Estate Services and Technology is one tool home owners can use to make certain they recognize all their alternatives without having relying solely on info supplied by their lender. For most homeowners,loan modification is a 1-shot deal: Realizing each option can aid property owners get the best terms for their exclusive economic predicament.

&#13

For much more details on the HAMP extension, the REST Report, and other critical loan modification aspects, pay a visit to LoanLove.com for the full news article.

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Wells Fargo Sued for Supplying Homeowner’s Temporary Mortgage Modifications With No Extended Term Plans To Make Them Permanent, according to Courthouse News Service.

Chicago, IL (PRWEB) June 12, 2012

A case has been filed against Wells Fargo by a group of struggling property owners. The accused bank is being sued for offering home owners temporary mortgage modifications with no long term plans to make them permanent, according to Courthouse News Service.

&#13

The courts are taking notice of the wide spread practice of deceptive behavior on the element of the huge banks such as Wells Fargo for providing customers temporary mortgage trial period modifications.

&#13

Lenders are in impact major struggling homeowners on to think that if they make their trial period mortgage payments they will be in a position to maintain their residences. Nonetheless, Colin Banyon, a foreclosure defense lawyer at The Mortgage Law Group, says the complete time the lender was accepting these payments from the homeowner they knew that they have been not going to supply these very same home owners a permanent modification and only intended to foreclose on the property.

&#13

If your lender is providing you the run around with regards to your loan modification or has instituted a foreclosure then its time that you seek the advice of with the skilled Loan Modification and Foreclosure Defense attorneys, says Banyon.

&#13

American homeowners arent alone in this fight. If you are struggling or know you will fall behind on your mortgage get support before it is also late.

&#13

The Mortgage Law Groups aim is to help homeowners now.

&#13

For a lot more details, check out: &#13

http://www.themortgagelawgroup.com.

&#13

About The Mortgage Law Group:&#13

The Mortgage Law Group is one particular of the most sophisticated customer protection law firms nationwide. Theyve helped thousands of customers save their properties and restore their lives. With offices positioned all through the country, the firms purpose is to provide outstanding service from hugely certified mortgage relief attorneys.

&#13

Case No. C 11-06595 JCS&#13

United States District Court&#13

Northern District of California

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Da Vinci Surgery Robot Lawsuit News: Bernstein Liebhard LLP Comments on Study Investigating Robot-Assisted Kidney Removal


New York, NY (PRWEB) June 06, 2013

As da Vinci robotic surgery lawsuit claims mount in courts around the nation, Bernstein Liebhard LLP notes that a new study has reported that the price of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (kidney removal) procedures has enhanced far more than 45 percent because 2010. Even though the research, which was presented on Could 7th at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association, discovered that individuals undergoing robot-assisted surgery typically did well, the study also reported much more “excessive” hospital charges related with the robotic process.*

&#13

We continue to hear from da Vinci surgery patients who have allegedly suffered serious complications due to bad robotic surgery. While the study noted that sufferers undergoing robotic partial nephrectomies typically did effectively, its findings with regards to excessive hospital charges are a reminder that the risks, benefits and charges linked with robot surgery need further evaluation, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing the victims of defective drugs and healthcare devices. The Firm is currently evaluating da Vinci surgery robot lawsuits on behalf of alleged victims of negative robotic surgery.

&#13

Da Vinci Surgery Robot Lawsuits&#13

According to court documents, the da Vinci Surgical Technique has been named in a increasing number of bad robotic surgery lawsuits. In an Apri 19th regulatory filing, Intuitive Surgical Inc., the manufacture of the robot, disclosed it had been served with at least 26 such claims, all of which allege injuries due to defects in the da Vinci robot, and/or inadequate coaching of surgeons. The nations very first trial of a Vinci surgery robot lawsuit concluded final month in Washington State Court, with a victory for Intuitive Surgical. Nevertheless, Bloomberg.com reported on May possibly 23rd that an lawyer representing the plaintiffs predicted numerous much more filings, and maintained that that several of these claims would have more favorable outcomes for alleged victims of undesirable robotic surgery.** (Estate of Fred E. Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical, 09-two-03136-5, Superior Court, State of Washington, Kitsap County)

&#13

Whilst the study presented last month at the American Association of Urology meeting reported good outcomes in robotic surgery individuals, an boost in adverse event reports connected to the da Vinci robot has caught the consideration of federal overall health regulators. According to a Bloomberg.com report published on February 28th, the da Vinci robot has been connected with 70 deaths in adverse occasion reports made to the U.S. Food &amp Drug Administration (FDA) given that 2009. Reports of poor robotic surgery complications have also improved, jumping to at least 115 in 2012 from 24 in 2009. In January the agency started to survey doctors who use the machine in order to aid it figure out if the increase is due to a difficulty with the da Vinci technology.***

&#13

In the previous, other research have raised queries about the fees and advantages of robotic surgery. For example, a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in February reported that the fees for a da Vinci hysterectomy was far more costly compared to other methods, with tiny difference in complication rates.*****

&#13

Alleged victims of negative robotic surgery related with the da Vinci robot might be eligible to file a individual injury lawsuit to receive compensation for medical expenditures, lost wages, discomfort and suffering, and far more. A wealth of data with regards to da Vinci surgery robot lawsuits is offered at Bernstein Liebhard LLPs website. For additional details, please call 800-511-5092.

&#13

*http://www.news-medical.net/news/20130508/Robotic-partial-nephrectomy-entails-excessive-hospital-charges.aspx news-medical.net, May possibly 8, 2013&#13

**sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1035267/000119312513162385/d508282d10q.htm Intuitive Surgical SEC Filing, April 19, 2013&#13

***bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-23/intuitive-wins-trial-defeats-negligent-education-claims.html Bloomberg.com, May possibly 23, 2013&#13

****bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-28/intuitive-surgical-robots-probed-by-u-s-in-survey-of-surgeons.html Bloomberg.co, February 28, 2013&#13

*****jama.jamanetwork.com/post.aspx?articleid=1653522 JAMA, February 20, 2013

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex individual and class action lawsuits nationwide given that 1993, including these who have been harmed by unsafe drugs, defective healthcare devices and consumer merchandise. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the leading plaintiffs firms in the country, for the past 10 consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

ten East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.

News for Homeowners; Reaching U Network is Now in 20 States Offering Affordable Legal Representation for Struggling Homeowners Not Able to Make Their Mortgage Payments

Miami, FL (PRWEB) May 11, 2011

Anyone denied a loan modification or can’t get through to your lender, help is on the way.

Reaching U Network is a 501c3 non-profit organization that is linked to Freedom Legal Plans by a long time service contract that provides low cost legal representation to homeowners facing foreclosure. Unlike most pre-paid legal services, Freedom Legal Plans specializes on providing members with immediate legal representation. Most homeowners facing foreclosure today need representation but can’t afford to hire an attorney. Reaching U Network helps struggling homeowners by offering different affordable payment options for those who qualify. In extreme cases, Reaching U Network, with the help of Freedom Legal Plans, will sometimes offer free representation with a network attorney.

Reaching U Network surveys homeowners about their legal options and also raises awareness thru television, marketing campaigns, and local workshops.

Members pay a $ 15.00 per month membership fee to access affordable legal representation provided by the Freedom Legal Network of attorneys. Members’ fee is tax deductible and is used to fund legal representation for homeowners with serious hardships such as unemployment.

Network attorneys with Freedom Legal Plans work under a set monthly fee and never an up front retainer fee. The monthly fee is far lower than what most attorneys charge for services provided. Homeowners will not sacrifice the quality of service because the network is monitored and managed by Freedom Legal Plans which makes customer service priority number one.

Reaching U Network has joined forces with Freedom Legal Plans to target the current epidemic of foreclosure by providing forensic and securitization audits to home owners looking to stay in their homes. These audits give a detail insight concerning fraud, TILA, HOPA, and securitization violations. With the assistance of the individual attorney representation these audits will help open legal communications between lenders and homeowners surpassing any loan modification process available today.

This overwhelming process is performed 100% under the umbrella of a local network attorney in the homeowners state. Each attorney has passed rigorous qualifications in order to join the network along with the knowledge on how to stop foreclosure.

5 reasons why homeowners should challenge their mortgage lender if facing foreclosure.

1. If the mortgage was opened between 1999 and 2009, the chances it contains fraud or predatory lending violations is 80%.

2. How to find out if the entity you are paying your mortgage to, has any right to collect?

3. Only 4% of loan modifications are approved.

4. Court ruling in Arizona and Massachusetts has wiped out many mortgage balances; these states are just a few of the many recently on the news.

5. Challenging a mortgage, in court with an attorney, can stop a foreclosure.

Anyone can make a donation and help. Funds will go toward helping struggling homeowners that can’t afford legal representation. Here is their site http://www.reachingunetwork.org

Here is the number to call if someone is facing foreclosure, has been denied a loan modification, or is falling behind on their mortgage payments, call 866-514-4636 or visit http://www.123savemyhome.com for help.

The worst thing to do is wait or do nothing, lenders have attorneys on their side, no one should face foreclosure alone.

###







Find More Securitization Audit Press Releases

DePuy ASR Hip Lawsuit News: Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes Request for Voluntary Dismissal in California DePuy Hip Recall Case


New York, New York (PRWEB) May 24, 2013

DePuy ASR lawsuit claims stemming from the 2010 DePuy hip recall continue to move forward in courts throughout the country, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to documents filed in Californias San Francisco Superior Court on April 25th, a Plaintiff who had been seeking an expedited trial of her DePuy hip lawsuit is voluntarily seeking dismissal of the case. (Tilman v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al., No. CGC11508806; Calif. Super. Ct., San Francisco).

This news is particularly interesting as when a case is voluntarily dismissed it is often an indication that the parties have come to an agreement, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing the victims of defective drugs and medical devices. The Firm continues to offer free legal evaluations to individuals who suffered metallosis, premature device failure, and other serious complications allegedly related to the 2010 DePuy hip recall.

DePuy ASR Hip Lawsuits

Court records indicate that there are more than 10,000 DePuy ASR hip lawsuits currently pending in courts throughout the U.S. The DePuy hip recall was announced after the metal-on-metal hip implants were found to be failing in an unacceptably high number of patients. The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) is now reviewing the safety of all metal hip implants, over fears that the devices can shed dangerous amounts of metal debris into patients bodies, leading to premature failure of the hips and other serious complications. In January, the agency proposed a new regulation that would make such devices ineligible for the agencys 510(k) clearance process, which allowed all-metal hips like the ASR hip to gain FDA approval without first undergoing human clinical trials. The FDA also advised doctors to test metal hip implant patients for elevated metal ion levels if they present with symptoms of a failing hip implant.*

The majority of DePuy hip lawsuits have been filed in a multidistrict litigation now underway in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio. Court records indicate that the first trials in that litigation will begin this September. (In re: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation MDL 2197) Two lawsuits have already gone to trial at the state level, one of which ended with a California Superior Court jury awarding the Plaintiff more than $ 8 million in damages. (Kransky v. DePuy, BC456086, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County) However, the jury hearing a second trial in Illinois state court found for DePuy. (Strum v. DePuy, 2011-L-9352, Circuit Court of Cook County) According to an April 16th report from The New York Times, documents submitted as evidence in both of those trials indicated that Johnson & Johnson and its DePuy Orthopaedics unit knew that the ASR was flawed years before the recall was announced, but did not disclose this information to the public or the medical community.**

Earlier this month, DePuy Orthopaedics announced it would end sales of metal-on-metal hip implants, citing recent FDA actions and decreased demand for the products, according to the New York Times. The sales suspension includes a metal-on-metal version of the companys DePuy Pinnacle hip replacement system, which is also the subject of lawsuits.*** Bernstein Liebhard partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is serving on the Plaintiffs Steering Committee in a multidistrict litigation established for DePuy Pinnacle lawsuits in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas. (In re: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2244)

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is actively filing claims in the DePuy ASR litigation underway in Ohio. Individuals who suffered metallosis, premature device failure or other complications allegedly related to the DePuy hip recall may be entitled to compensation for their medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages. A wealth of information regarding DePuy ASR hip lawsuits is available on Bernstein Liebhard LLPs website. For a free case review, please contact one of our attorneys by calling 800-511-5092.

*fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241604.htm

**nytimes.com/2013/04/17/business/johnson-johnson-wins-case-on-artificial-hip.html?ref=health&_r=0

***nytimes.com/2013/05/17/business/jj-is-phasing-out-metal-replacement-hips.html?ref=health&_r=0

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex individual and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, including those who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective medical devices and consumer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the top plaintiffs firms in the country, for the past 10 consecutive years.

Bernstein Liebhard LLP

10 East 40th Street

New York, New York 10016

800-511-5092

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.